Events
11 / 7
| ||
11 / 8
| ||
11 / 9
| ||
11 / 10
| ||
11 / 11
Start: 12:45 pm
End: 2:00 pm
In the seminar room (SBS S207) | ||
11 / 12
| ||
11 / 13
Start: 3:30 pm
End: 5:00 pm
This talk will be on Friday, November 13th at 3:30 in SAC 304. Title: Rutgers University | ||
11 / 14
| ||
11 / 15
| ||
11 / 16
| ||
11 / 17
| ||
11 / 18
| ||
11 / 19
| ||
11 / 20
Start: 3:30 pm
End: 5:00 pm
Coda devoicing and perceptual similarity Languages resolve voiced obstruents in codas by devoicing but not by any other phonological means (i.e. nasalization, deletion or epenthesis). For example, the underlying /ab/ can become [ap], but not *[am], *[aba] or *[a]. Steriade (2001/2008) claims that (i) speakers maximize the similarity between inputs and outputs, assuming that (ii) devoicing yields an outcome that is most similar to the original form. | ||
11 / 21
| ||
11 / 22
| ||
11 / 23
| ||
11 / 24
| ||
11 / 25
| ||
11 / 26
| ||
11 / 27
| ||
11 / 28
| ||
11 / 29
| ||
11 / 30
| ||
12 / 1
| ||
12 / 2
| ||
12 / 3
| ||
12 / 4
| ||
12 / 5
| ||
12 / 6
| ||
12 / 7
| ||
